I attended a conference in London a couple of weeks ago called ‘The Art of Access’. The conference brought together visually impaired people, artists, educators and professional audio describers for an intensive day of talking, listening, and coffee and sandwich consumption! The conference sought to give air time to new thinking, current thinking, and best practice in the realm of giving the visually impaired access to the visual. I think the gathering was a great success with some very memorable moments.
Hoary old audio description issues were revisited: the pros and cons of subjective versus objective audio description of the arts, the risks and rewards of ‘bolt on’ versus integrated access to the arts , the costs and benefits of new technologies as applied to access.
The reason I am writing about this here is because of the contribution made to the conference by the professional audio describer and author of a new book on the subject, Louise Fryer. Her summary of what she considers important in audio description sits very comfortably with my own ideas on the subject.
Louise emphasised the importance of using simple language when describing the arts to the blind. Ordinary words should be employed to convey extraordinary visual phenomena.
She emphasised the importance of communicating the effect of the object being described. She stressed that at bottom ‘emotion’ is the common currency between describer and listener. To this end she quoted Olafur Eliasson and called for conveying the ‘felt thought’ when trying to find the words to describe what you are seeing.
Louise also stressed the importance of understanding the nature of ‘art’ itself as a prerequisite for describing art to others.
So the describer is not a disinterested conduit through which a blind spectator ‘sees’ the object. Rather he/she is an involved participant in a triangular relationship between object, describer and blind person with emotion being the medium of exchange.